"MY EXPERIENCE OF THE CARTEL" Domenico Cimino _________________________________________________________________________________ Some years ago I attended my first sign. There were four "plus one" and we worked together for about three years. The Cartel, as well as for analysis, requires a certain regularity and some effort. It 's a group where people meet regularly and work around an argument or a written, from many different angles between their subjective and you try to witness and to transmit its unique work that is done in solitude. The Cartel has to do with knowledge, but know what it is? When I think back to my university course I can testify to a different relationship with my knowledge. For me to know the university was the assimilation of a number of formulas to be repeated to those who would assess and, if approved through a symbolic act that would have allowed me to practice. University knowledge was for me a soporific know that did not include my subjectivity. I after the period of the University "desiring to receive a license as a driving school," as Lacan says about the training analyst. Then, once you reach the coveted title, I went looking for means by which practice as a psychologist. This research was outlined just why, but I do not even realize it, the knowledge accumulated at the University left me in a position of powerlessness and bewilderment. Then I met psychoanalysis. The knowledge in question is not the same sign in the university to know. What leads to knowledge, says Lacan, is not the desire to know, but the discourse of hysteria. In theory of "four discourses" conceptualized by Lacan, we know that are assigned to different fates depending on the discourse under consideration. In academic discourse, knowledge is placed in position of the dominant discourse, the place of the agent. The knowledge in the academic discourse is not only a position of command, but is also located above the bar of repression, under which we find, in place of truth, S1, the master signifier. In the discourse of the university, as regards knowledge, this is a managed knowledge, a theoretical knowledge, combined, whose truth is not the teaching, in fact the place of the agent is also called by Lacan appearance, but the attempt to control the one who teaches to the students. This does not mean that teaching is a dictator, but it is a discursive structure, therefore making social ties and group, in which knowledge is made and is conditioned by the act authorizing it (S1), which provides that there is identification. With regard to the discourse of hysteria, it is a discursive operation that is central to the analysand. For Lacan the subject in the discourse analysis must pass through hysterical because the symptom (S slash), interrogates the Master Signifier (S1) to produce a knowledge (S2). However, the knowledge produced is marked by the inability to limit which takes the place of truth, because that is the object of his desire. In the discourse of the analyst's place is occupied by knowing the truth (S2). The knowledge in this position means that the truth as you know is an enigma. In his speech analyst, he works through the interpretation of so allusive, enigmatic in a way that refers to a meaning but that, through a semi-say, push the subject to produce his knowledge to its limit. The subject in analysis through free association, in fact, is paradoxically forced to produce its own knowledge. So we can say that knowledge on to the cartel is not comparable to the knowledge of the discourse of the university, as this is an authoritative knowledge. He approaches the hysterical speech as prompts for the production of knowledge, but refers to knowledge of the analyst's speech because that speech is at stake from the knowledge of the subject and is limited. Lacan says that the analyst must renounce any temptation to respond even a little 'to the question, meaning that it must give up to promote the identification of the patient. The same warning appears to be the intent of Lacan's work to turn the school around the sign. The sign is no accident that the contemporary creation of the School. For Lacan it is impossible for psychoanalysts form a group and that is why we invented the poster. Miller notes that the creation of a small group to carry out the work of the School, Lacan intended to create a non-hierarchical work device, in which the identification was not the leader, the one who holds the knowledge. Lacan does not deny the fact that each group there will be a leader, but it does work as a leading moderate, poor. As for my place in the folder to which I attended, I was asked to approach the subject from which angle you choose. I decided to start from what at that time raised many questions in me. I left the job done in social and educational contact with children diagnosed with mental retardation. Working with these guys awakened in me many questions and could not be content merely to consider mental retardation as the result of a test. This dissatisfaction has been the engine of my work in and sign with other members, I have not found the answers, but I was able to recalibrate my position at work with these people. It 's interesting to note that in this phenomenon, the subject arises in respect of knowledge in a particular position. The person with mental retardation, Lacan's view, it makes it weak to leave the truth and know the place of the Other, and thus remain in a position where it is put into play the subjectivity.
0 comments:
Post a Comment