Wednesday, January 26, 2011
Mighty Mugg Peter Parker Comic Con
Interview with Jean-Louis Gault - Psychiatrist, Psychoanalyst AME AMP and ECF - PHAEDRA Bucella Secretary of SLP SLP RIMINI Rimini
Cards For Godmotherschristening
Secretariat: Speech delivered on the occasion of the day in preparation for the Conference Turin 2010 "FROM THE UNCONSCIOUS"
Can an institution from the psychoanalytic unconscious? M. Antonella Del Monaco Beginning with a premise: To me, the School embodies significant agalmatico value, and locate the vehicle for my desire for psychoanalysis, for the School, what Lacan, founded in a position of isolation from its relationship with the analytical result. For this my thanks go first, to "the small group" of his students, who created the ECF, has chosen to continue with school and with the pass trying "to prove that these concepts are an integral part of his teaching remove them completely and that is to underestimate its logic. "It is solely from my desire for the School of Lacan that originated this work. **** Theoretical coordinates of this work: 1. Marco Focchi, from the unconscious. 2. JA Miller, Lacan's school, in explanation on Lacan, Antigone Editions, 2008. 3. JA Miller, Lacan's Seminar policy, in the Clipboard N: 59,62,66,67,69. Focchi Marco, President of our school, introducing the topic of the next meeting to be held in Turin, from the unconscious, says that is a matter "essentially political", because it puts a line of demarcation between - "a on this side "- the location, the choice of the School of Psychoanalysis, where they place on the side of the unconscious - a" beyond "-" officials of normality ", which aim to forcludere the subject. It seems to me, that 'the political' is so placed, to mark the different location, the contrast between the psychoanalytic discourse and the discourse of the master. The first logically attributed to the School, the second place of the emblem out of it. With this speech - from the two texts that I have worked and the situation that our school is currently going through - and I would like to bring to question the political issue, "inside" the institution "in that relationship is the establishment in structure, with the psychoanalytic discourse and the discourse of the master? Put another way: Can an institution from the psychoanalytic unconscious? Institution that encourages or at least does not put obstacles to the psychoanalytic discourse? It is a question that arises at the level of logic, that I post and I refer you, limiting myself today to highlight a few items: 1. "Lacan's career, as well as rebuilds JAM Seminar in Lacanian policy, 2. acts committed by Lacan, 3. As Miller writes in The School of Lacan: "The establishment of psychoanalytic training antinomian than the psychoanalytic discourse." 1. "Lacan's career." It scans the resume briefly: - in '53 is the splitting of the Psychoanalytic Society of Paris: Lacan goes away and is out of the IPA. - Become a part of the French Society of Psychoanalysis. Years later, the SFP will ask for admission to the IPA and the '59 will be overseen by the IPA. - In '63 the excommunication - a directive on the IPA-SFP forbids him to "hold the status of training analyst, that is to train psychoanalysts. - In '64 he founded the Ecole de Paris freudienne. - In '67 pass his proposal is rejected by the AE and AME of the School. - Will be upheld in '69 when will propose to the entire school, even non-vote by analysts. A considerable number of notables will be gone. - In the 80s there is dissolution. - In '81 the failure to form a new school, forcing him to adopt the Ecole de la Cause freudienne. I wonder: What, in this sequence of events is due to the very structure of the psychoanalytic institution? What is opposed to the structure of psychoanalytic discourse and puts obstacles? ***** 2. From 1953 to 1963 - due to its exit from the SPP - will start his teaching see the "return to Freud," which aims to restore the understanding of psychoanalysis. Since '63 Lacan "deals with the institutional consequences of his teaching - his teaching is to outline a certain type of institution-and gives its consequences for teaching institution ": a new type of association, the school, a new way to work, the billboard, the pass by which a new definition of the psychoanalyst. "It's not doing petty political analyst who becomes the school, but doing their analysis. [..] Be in sight, have been busy for the dissemination of psychoanalysis, are things that do not give any credit analyst to become the School. Lacan was able to thus support the institution. Can you really say that such an institution promotes the psychoanalytic discourse, and thus fosters the analysis. "We could then say that he has created an institution from the unconscious. Because at some point something is opposed? And what? Miller makes us see the position of Lacan, as he considers the events of '63 as a result of a deviation within psychoanalysis, created by the conviction that we can know in advance what an analyst in the psychoanalytic field is not can produce nothing more than conformity. The deviation is due to the fact that the institution is a knowing, IPA SA what is psychoanalysis, what is an analyst and the assertion of orthodoxy. Lacan's response will therefore replace the company with the school or an institution which has the distinction of not knowing what one analyst. Arising out of it two consequences: the opening to the non-analyst, as is the sign of this ignorance and transformation in work: the pass. It then creates an institution more suited to the structure of the unconscious: there is a gap in knowledge, in knowing there is something you can not know which is the unconscious knowledge. I would now like to refer to the double value of the Pass, as Miller puts it well to the fore: the pass allows you to include a lack in the institution: "An institution that includes the pass is formed around a lack, around the 'bar, around a not-knowing that Lacan called the School. "The pass allows you to include in the analytic setting up:" The step also installs the psychoanalytic establishment in the heart of psychoanalytic experience ", because the analysand speaks of its analysis to an instance of the School. After the excommunication del'63 Lacan makes a disjunction, "considered to be able to separate the discovery of the unconscious, psychoanalysis one hand, and the IPA." Breaks the identity, equivalence, Psychoanalysis - IPA, separating it from psychoanalysis. • PSYCHOANALYSIS = IPA or IPA PSYCHOANALYSIS ≠ disjunction that it will happen again in '69 - as a result of opposition to his proposal of the pass. Lacan notes that the school is not in the aims that the successful trial, "There is psychoanalysis, and there is the school, and especially not to confuse the two. The aim is to psychoanalysis, the school is only half ... "• PSYCHOANALYSIS SCHOOL ≠" is not that an association like the others "," made up of individuals with which we must negotiate. " ***** 3. It is interesting to note that Miller be placed in the right place for the word "institution" put it in with the words "subjective destitution." He emphasizes that each institution is an attempt to establish another in which the subject may find a place and how those analyzing / you perceive to be more a lack, sucking even more to have a place in the Other. "[...] Not knowing what the analyst would like even more the status of a member, secretary, president." Compared to this point, had previously suggested that "as the basis [...] that dominates the institutional question of psychoanalysis [is located], the formula that the analyst does not exist." "The significant analyst is structured as a signifier of the bar (A). "As he explained that by the end of analysis is produced disessere Other. It is in relation to these elements, in this sense that it is his statement? "The establishment of psychoanalytic training is so antinomian than the psychoanalytic discourse: this is a fact. It is also a fact that every psychoanalytic group is a defense against the psychoanalytic discourse. "In conclusion a few lines later:" We must take the facts associated as a consequence of the psychoanalytic discourse. "Psychoanalyst State SLP. J-A.Miller, School of Lacan, in explanation on Lacan, Antigone Editions, 2008, p.342. Ibid, p.334. JA Miller, Lacan's Seminar policy, in Notes No. 66, p.2. J-A.Miller, School of Lacan, in explanation on Lacan, Antigone Editions, 2008, p.337. Ibid, p.341. Ibid, p.336. Ibid, p.336. JAMiller, Lacan Seminar policy, in Notes No. 59, p. 16 J. Lacan, L'adresse du juri, in Sem. Lacanian policy, in Notes 66, p. 11 JAMiller, Lacan Seminar policy, in Notes 66, p. 12. J. Lacan, L'adresse du juri, in Sem. Lacanian policy, in Notes 66, p. 11-A.Miller J., School of Lacan, in explanation on Lacan, Antigone Editions, 2008, p.334. J-A.Miller, School of Lacan, in Explanation on Lacan, Antigone Editions, 2008, p.332. Ibid, p.333. Ibid, p.334. 
Can an institution from the psychoanalytic unconscious? M. Antonella Del Monaco Beginning with a premise: To me, the School embodies significant agalmatico value, and locate the vehicle for my desire for psychoanalysis, for the School, what Lacan, founded in a position of isolation from its relationship with the analytical result. For this my thanks go first, to "the small group" of his students, who created the ECF, has chosen to continue with school and with the pass trying "to prove that these concepts are an integral part of his teaching remove them completely and that is to underestimate its logic. "It is solely from my desire for the School of Lacan that originated this work. **** Theoretical coordinates of this work: 1. Marco Focchi, from the unconscious. 2. JA Miller, Lacan's school, in explanation on Lacan, Antigone Editions, 2008. 3. JA Miller, Lacan's Seminar policy, in the Clipboard N: 59,62,66,67,69. Focchi Marco, President of our school, introducing the topic of the next meeting to be held in Turin, from the unconscious, says that is a matter "essentially political", because it puts a line of demarcation between - "a on this side "- the location, the choice of the School of Psychoanalysis, where they place on the side of the unconscious - a" beyond "-" officials of normality ", which aim to forcludere the subject. It seems to me, that 'the political' is so placed, to mark the different location, the contrast between the psychoanalytic discourse and the discourse of the master. The first logically attributed to the School, the second place of the emblem out of it. With this speech - from the two texts that I have worked and the situation that our school is currently going through - and I would like to bring to question the political issue, "inside" the institution "in that relationship is the establishment in structure, with the psychoanalytic discourse and the discourse of the master? Put another way: Can an institution from the psychoanalytic unconscious? Institution that encourages or at least does not put obstacles to the psychoanalytic discourse? It is a question that arises at the level of logic, that I post and I refer you, limiting myself today to highlight a few items: 1. "Lacan's career, as well as rebuilds JAM Seminar in Lacanian policy, 2. acts committed by Lacan, 3. As Miller writes in The School of Lacan: "The establishment of psychoanalytic training antinomian than the psychoanalytic discourse." 1. "Lacan's career." It scans the resume briefly: - in '53 is the splitting of the Psychoanalytic Society of Paris: Lacan goes away and is out of the IPA. - Become a part of the French Society of Psychoanalysis. Years later, the SFP will ask for admission to the IPA and the '59 will be overseen by the IPA. - In '63 the excommunication - a directive on the IPA-SFP forbids him to "hold the status of training analyst, that is to train psychoanalysts. - In '64 he founded the Ecole de Paris freudienne. - In '67 pass his proposal is rejected by the AE and AME of the School. - Will be upheld in '69 when will propose to the entire school, even non-vote by analysts. A considerable number of notables will be gone. - In the 80s there is dissolution. - In '81 the failure to form a new school, forcing him to adopt the Ecole de la Cause freudienne. I wonder: What, in this sequence of events is due to the very structure of the psychoanalytic institution? What is opposed to the structure of psychoanalytic discourse and puts obstacles? ***** 2. From 1953 to 1963 - due to its exit from the SPP - will start his teaching see the "return to Freud," which aims to restore the understanding of psychoanalysis. Since '63 Lacan "deals with the institutional consequences of his teaching - his teaching is to outline a certain type of institution-and gives its consequences for teaching institution ": a new type of association, the school, a new way to work, the billboard, the pass by which a new definition of the psychoanalyst. "It's not doing petty political analyst who becomes the school, but doing their analysis. [..] Be in sight, have been busy for the dissemination of psychoanalysis, are things that do not give any credit analyst to become the School. Lacan was able to thus support the institution. Can you really say that such an institution promotes the psychoanalytic discourse, and thus fosters the analysis. "We could then say that he has created an institution from the unconscious. Because at some point something is opposed? And what? Miller makes us see the position of Lacan, as he considers the events of '63 as a result of a deviation within psychoanalysis, created by the conviction that we can know in advance what an analyst in the psychoanalytic field is not can produce nothing more than conformity. The deviation is due to the fact that the institution is a knowing, IPA SA what is psychoanalysis, what is an analyst and the assertion of orthodoxy. Lacan's response will therefore replace the company with the school or an institution which has the distinction of not knowing what one analyst. Arising out of it two consequences: the opening to the non-analyst, as is the sign of this ignorance and transformation in work: the pass. It then creates an institution more suited to the structure of the unconscious: there is a gap in knowledge, in knowing there is something you can not know which is the unconscious knowledge. I would now like to refer to the double value of the Pass, as Miller puts it well to the fore: the pass allows you to include a lack in the institution: "An institution that includes the pass is formed around a lack, around the 'bar, around a not-knowing that Lacan called the School. "The pass allows you to include in the analytic setting up:" The step also installs the psychoanalytic establishment in the heart of psychoanalytic experience ", because the analysand speaks of its analysis to an instance of the School. After the excommunication del'63 Lacan makes a disjunction, "considered to be able to separate the discovery of the unconscious, psychoanalysis one hand, and the IPA." Breaks the identity, equivalence, Psychoanalysis - IPA, separating it from psychoanalysis. • PSYCHOANALYSIS = IPA or IPA PSYCHOANALYSIS ≠ disjunction that it will happen again in '69 - as a result of opposition to his proposal of the pass. Lacan notes that the school is not in the aims that the successful trial, "There is psychoanalysis, and there is the school, and especially not to confuse the two. The aim is to psychoanalysis, the school is only half ... "• PSYCHOANALYSIS SCHOOL ≠" is not that an association like the others "," made up of individuals with which we must negotiate. " ***** 3. It is interesting to note that Miller be placed in the right place for the word "institution" put it in with the words "subjective destitution." He emphasizes that each institution is an attempt to establish another in which the subject may find a place and how those analyzing / you perceive to be more a lack, sucking even more to have a place in the Other. "[...] Not knowing what the analyst would like even more the status of a member, secretary, president." Compared to this point, had previously suggested that "as the basis [...] that dominates the institutional question of psychoanalysis [is located], the formula that the analyst does not exist." "The significant analyst is structured as a signifier of the bar (A). "As he explained that by the end of analysis is produced disessere Other. It is in relation to these elements, in this sense that it is his statement? "The establishment of psychoanalytic training is so antinomian than the psychoanalytic discourse: this is a fact. It is also a fact that every psychoanalytic group is a defense against the psychoanalytic discourse. "In conclusion a few lines later:" We must take the facts associated as a consequence of the psychoanalytic discourse. "Psychoanalyst State SLP. J-A.Miller, School of Lacan, in explanation on Lacan, Antigone Editions, 2008, p.342. Ibid, p.334. JA Miller, Lacan's Seminar policy, in Notes No. 66, p.2. J-A.Miller, School of Lacan, in explanation on Lacan, Antigone Editions, 2008, p.337. Ibid, p.341. Ibid, p.336. Ibid, p.336. JAMiller, Lacan Seminar policy, in Notes No. 59, p. 16 J. Lacan, L'adresse du juri, in Sem. Lacanian policy, in Notes 66, p. 11 JAMiller, Lacan Seminar policy, in Notes 66, p. 12. J. Lacan, L'adresse du juri, in Sem. Lacanian policy, in Notes 66, p. 11-A.Miller J., School of Lacan, in explanation on Lacan, Antigone Editions, 2008, p.334. J-A.Miller, School of Lacan, in Explanation on Lacan, Antigone Editions, 2008, p.332. Ibid, p.333. Ibid, p.334.
Monday, January 17, 2011
California Booster Seat Safety 8 Or 80
FRIDAY 'January 21, 2011 "Je T'aime, Moi non plus. Men and women, according to Lacan" JEAN-LOUIS Gault
For the series of conferences entitled "Between man and woman", organized by the antenna of the Freudian Field Institute of Rimini and Freudian for the clinic, therapy and science, will be held Friday, January 21 the following meeting: PROGRAMME hours 8:00 p.m. to 8:30 p.m. Registration of participants 20:30 to 22:30 hours Je T'aime, Moi non plus. Men and women, according to Lacan supervisor: Jean-Louis Gault, Nantes Psychiatrist, Psychoanalyst AME AMP and the ECF, Professor of Clinical Section of Nantes hours 22:30 to 23:30: Debate supervisor M. ANTONELLA OF MONACO Psychoanalyst's PBL and AMP, Lecturer Institute Freudian Place: Sala degli Archi - dell'Arengo Palace - Piazza Cavour - Rimini 
For the series of conferences entitled "Between man and woman", organized by the antenna of the Freudian Field Institute of Rimini and Freudian for the clinic, therapy and science, will be held Friday, January 21 the following meeting: PROGRAMME hours 8:00 p.m. to 8:30 p.m. Registration of participants 20:30 to 22:30 hours Je T'aime, Moi non plus. Men and women, according to Lacan supervisor: Jean-Louis Gault, Nantes Psychiatrist, Psychoanalyst AME AMP and the ECF, Professor of Clinical Section of Nantes hours 22:30 to 23:30: Debate supervisor M. ANTONELLA OF MONACO Psychoanalyst's PBL and AMP, Lecturer Institute Freudian Place: Sala degli Archi - dell'Arengo Palace - Piazza Cavour - Rimini
How Often Do You Get Sick With Hiv
THE CHILD AND FAMILY review for Maria Rita Conrad on the sites: http://www.ilcortile-consultorio.it; http://www.psicologiutili.it
The child and the family is a diverse and complex text, but agile and exciting. It 'a text which is not addressed only to "insiders" but to the world of culture and, ultimately, to the families themselves for its vibrant clarity and precise for the synthesis that never fails to target the psychoanalytic investigation of the rigor . This volume, second in the series promoted by the antenna of Rimini, is intended to articulate with the news that Jacques Lacan's text explores the complex family and, in some ways, advocates on the crisis through the contemporary family and the birth of new family forms. The child and the family begins with a panel discussion entitled "The father of the sacred and profane" that were present: John Rose, in which the volume is dedicated, the Vicar General of the Diocese of Rimini, Aldo Amati, which addresses the statute the fatherhood of God from the old to the New Testament scholar of sacred art and symbolic Alessandro Giovanardi, in order to articulate the theme of fatherhood in sacred, comments on three works of the Master of Faenza, and two of Giovanni Bellini and his students; the conductor Paolo Olmi discussing the figure and the concept of fatherhood in the drama of opera, the psychoanalyst Pierre-Gilles Gueguen points out that the concept of paternal function in Freud and Lacan. In this round table, in a fruitful comparison between theology, sacred art, music and psychoanalysis, as written by Antonio Di Ciaccia is "addressing the issue - from the complex family - his father's side: its shape, its function, its statute, its very existence and non-existence, His incarnation, or his rejection in humans. " The volume continues with five lessons "master" of Esthela Solano-Suarez, Massimo Terms, Virginio Baio, Lilia Mahjoub and Pierre-Gilles Gueguen, in which family members are annotated complexes in perspective with the following Lacan's teaching, to the progress around the development of "names-of-father" and the clinic Borromean place in dialectic with new morphologies that today the family and new forms of child and adolescent distress assume. A third part, entitled "Today" begins with a clinical case treated at the Psychoanalytic Center for Counselling and Therapy (CPCT) in Paris, dedicated to the function of "cutting" that the analytical treatment can be made between a mother and a daughter when the paternal function was inoperative. The following is a text devoted to the maximum extent all'Amleto, which deals with the emergence of inhibition between subjective desire and mourning identification with the phallus. Concludes the third part of a text in which Lilia Mahjoub complexes households, is reconsidered in light of the significant fall of the bosses and the rise to the zenith of the object, the location where the child can increasingly find themselves. In the fourth part, short but stimulating contributions of Marianna Matteoni, Loretta Biondi, Gabriele Pazzaglia, Antonella Del Monaco and Loredana Zani face: the psychopathology of autism outlined by Lacan in the debate on the Complex and current therapeutic techniques released by an ethic of the subject, the irreducible transmission between parents and children shorter than the analysis Freud has led to Gustav Mahler, and the manner in which the Oedipus complex is substantiated or not, in families today, as the organizer of psychic development, the functions that parenting in the family of those who today are no longer in incarnate or go to "tilt "drug addiction, which puts in check the relationship with the Other and the tyrannical and unconscious by an object at stake in the direction of care. The volume concludes with a theoretical study of Raffaele Calabria dedicated to the 'I through the optical system used by Lacan. " Final assumption, namely that "the ego is the place par excellence of the imagination, whose knotting with symbolic and the real is conceived by Lacan as the first, basic and essential articulation of Freud's discovery, "may recognize the sense of positioning of the contribution to the volume and the crowning point of conjunction with the beginning, dedicated to his father and function father, as if the node with which the three registries, real, imaginary and symbolic, the article is that "Name-of-the-Father", of which only one can do without using it, that the basis for ethics and practice of psychoanalysis Lacanian orientation. 
The child and the family is a diverse and complex text, but agile and exciting. It 'a text which is not addressed only to "insiders" but to the world of culture and, ultimately, to the families themselves for its vibrant clarity and precise for the synthesis that never fails to target the psychoanalytic investigation of the rigor . This volume, second in the series promoted by the antenna of Rimini, is intended to articulate with the news that Jacques Lacan's text explores the complex family and, in some ways, advocates on the crisis through the contemporary family and the birth of new family forms. The child and the family begins with a panel discussion entitled "The father of the sacred and profane" that were present: John Rose, in which the volume is dedicated, the Vicar General of the Diocese of Rimini, Aldo Amati, which addresses the statute the fatherhood of God from the old to the New Testament scholar of sacred art and symbolic Alessandro Giovanardi, in order to articulate the theme of fatherhood in sacred, comments on three works of the Master of Faenza, and two of Giovanni Bellini and his students; the conductor Paolo Olmi discussing the figure and the concept of fatherhood in the drama of opera, the psychoanalyst Pierre-Gilles Gueguen points out that the concept of paternal function in Freud and Lacan. In this round table, in a fruitful comparison between theology, sacred art, music and psychoanalysis, as written by Antonio Di Ciaccia is "addressing the issue - from the complex family - his father's side: its shape, its function, its statute, its very existence and non-existence, His incarnation, or his rejection in humans. " The volume continues with five lessons "master" of Esthela Solano-Suarez, Massimo Terms, Virginio Baio, Lilia Mahjoub and Pierre-Gilles Gueguen, in which family members are annotated complexes in perspective with the following Lacan's teaching, to the progress around the development of "names-of-father" and the clinic Borromean place in dialectic with new morphologies that today the family and new forms of child and adolescent distress assume. A third part, entitled "Today" begins with a clinical case treated at the Psychoanalytic Center for Counselling and Therapy (CPCT) in Paris, dedicated to the function of "cutting" that the analytical treatment can be made between a mother and a daughter when the paternal function was inoperative. The following is a text devoted to the maximum extent all'Amleto, which deals with the emergence of inhibition between subjective desire and mourning identification with the phallus. Concludes the third part of a text in which Lilia Mahjoub complexes households, is reconsidered in light of the significant fall of the bosses and the rise to the zenith of the object, the location where the child can increasingly find themselves. In the fourth part, short but stimulating contributions of Marianna Matteoni, Loretta Biondi, Gabriele Pazzaglia, Antonella Del Monaco and Loredana Zani face: the psychopathology of autism outlined by Lacan in the debate on the Complex and current therapeutic techniques released by an ethic of the subject, the irreducible transmission between parents and children shorter than the analysis Freud has led to Gustav Mahler, and the manner in which the Oedipus complex is substantiated or not, in families today, as the organizer of psychic development, the functions that parenting in the family of those who today are no longer in incarnate or go to "tilt "drug addiction, which puts in check the relationship with the Other and the tyrannical and unconscious by an object at stake in the direction of care. The volume concludes with a theoretical study of Raffaele Calabria dedicated to the 'I through the optical system used by Lacan. " Final assumption, namely that "the ego is the place par excellence of the imagination, whose knotting with symbolic and the real is conceived by Lacan as the first, basic and essential articulation of Freud's discovery, "may recognize the sense of positioning of the contribution to the volume and the crowning point of conjunction with the beginning, dedicated to his father and function father, as if the node with which the three registries, real, imaginary and symbolic, the article is that "Name-of-the-Father", of which only one can do without using it, that the basis for ethics and practice of psychoanalysis Lacanian orientation.
Intelectron Instructions
CONFERENCE 2011 "BETWEEN MEN AND WOMEN" - FRIDAY 'January 21, February 25, March 11, April 15, 2011
www.istitutofreudiano.it www.bibliotecalacaniana.it www.lapsicoanalisi.it www.cecli.it www.forumpsi.it • Participation Free CME • EVENTS • 40.00 administration fee for the final certificate ECM Info and registration: Cell: 338 8230339 E-mail: fedrabucelli@gmail.com Institute Freudian FOR CLINIC, THERAPY AND SCIENCE ANTENNA Field of the Freudian Rimini INSTITUTE entitled to it under Article 3 of Law 18.12.89, N ° 56 (DM31.12.93) ADJUSTMENT UNDER THE DL May 25, 2001 UNDER THE PATRONAGE OF THE PROVINCE OF RIMINI FRIDAY '21 gennaio 2011 hours 20:00-20 : 30 participants Registration 20:30 to 22:30 hours Je T'aime, Moi non plus. Men and women, according to Lacan supervisor: Jean-Louis Gault, Nantes Psychiatrist, Psychoanalyst AME AMP and the ECF, Professor Nantes Chamber of clinical hours 22:30 to 23:30: Debate supervisor M. ANTONELLA OF MONACO Psychoanalyst of PBL and AMP, Lecturer Institute Freudian FRIDAY '25 febbraio 2011 hours 20:30 to 10:30 p.m. Women and pretended tutor CAROLE DEWAMBRECHIES-La Sagna, Bordeaux Psychiatrist, Psychoanalyst AME AMP and ECF, Professor at the Bordeaux Chamber of clinical hours 22:30 to 23:30: Debate supervisor LORETTA BIONDI, Psychoanalyst of PBL and AMP FRIDAY 'March 11, 2011 ore 8:30 p.m. to 22:30 between men and women , fragments of love tutor: MAXIMUM TERMS, Rome Psychoanalyst of PBL and AMP, Professor Institute Freudian 22:30 to 23:30 hours: Debate supervisor PIERANGELO ALSO, Participant SLP FRIDAY '15 aprile 2011 hours 20:30 to 22:30 Why men and women is not doing? Supervisor Esthela SOLANO-SUAREZ, Paris Psychoanalyst AME AMP and ECF 22:30 to 23:00 hours: Debate supervisor Domenico Cimino, SLP Participant hours 23:00 to 23:30: Accreditation CME Place: Sala degli Archi - Palazzo dell'Arengo - Piazza Cavour - Rimini 
www.istitutofreudiano.it www.bibliotecalacaniana.it www.lapsicoanalisi.it www.cecli.it www.forumpsi.it • Participation Free CME • EVENTS • 40.00 administration fee for the final certificate ECM Info and registration: Cell: 338 8230339 E-mail: fedrabucelli@gmail.com Institute Freudian FOR CLINIC, THERAPY AND SCIENCE ANTENNA Field of the Freudian Rimini INSTITUTE entitled to it under Article 3 of Law 18.12.89, N ° 56 (DM31.12.93) ADJUSTMENT UNDER THE DL May 25, 2001 UNDER THE PATRONAGE OF THE PROVINCE OF RIMINI FRIDAY '21 gennaio 2011 hours 20:00-20 : 30 participants Registration 20:30 to 22:30 hours Je T'aime, Moi non plus. Men and women, according to Lacan supervisor: Jean-Louis Gault, Nantes Psychiatrist, Psychoanalyst AME AMP and the ECF, Professor Nantes Chamber of clinical hours 22:30 to 23:30: Debate supervisor M. ANTONELLA OF MONACO Psychoanalyst of PBL and AMP, Lecturer Institute Freudian FRIDAY '25 febbraio 2011 hours 20:30 to 10:30 p.m. Women and pretended tutor CAROLE DEWAMBRECHIES-La Sagna, Bordeaux Psychiatrist, Psychoanalyst AME AMP and ECF, Professor at the Bordeaux Chamber of clinical hours 22:30 to 23:30: Debate supervisor LORETTA BIONDI, Psychoanalyst of PBL and AMP FRIDAY 'March 11, 2011 ore 8:30 p.m. to 22:30 between men and women , fragments of love tutor: MAXIMUM TERMS, Rome Psychoanalyst of PBL and AMP, Professor Institute Freudian 22:30 to 23:30 hours: Debate supervisor PIERANGELO ALSO, Participant SLP FRIDAY '15 aprile 2011 hours 20:30 to 22:30 Why men and women is not doing? Supervisor Esthela SOLANO-SUAREZ, Paris Psychoanalyst AME AMP and ECF 22:30 to 23:00 hours: Debate supervisor Domenico Cimino, SLP Participant hours 23:00 to 23:30: Accreditation CME Place: Sala degli Archi - Palazzo dell'Arengo - Piazza Cavour - Rimini
Thursday, January 13, 2011
Hedge Fund Operation Cost
There HAARP behind the memory of birds?
"All we know so far is that it is something strange. Even in Louisiana, dead birds raining from the sky [...]. An autopsy on some of the birds revealed that the birds died from blood clots due to internal injuries. The problem is what may have caused these injuries experts [...]. Excluding the possibility of poisoning. [...]. And in America there ' who has assumed responsibility for the massacre is the so-called HAARP, the military and civil facilities for scientific research on the upper atmosphere and ionosphere and radio communications for military use. The installation in fact it would a transmitter capable of transmitting electromagnetic waves that might, in theory, have killed the birds, ". (From videocorriere: Moria of birds, the yellow is extended to Louisiana and Sweden .)
This map shows where the most important stations HAARP. Note that these are the same geographical areas where mysterious deaths have been recorded? And then another question to ask is: why only certain types of birds die, and why only certain species of fish? The installation of Gakona
enter daily exorbitant amount of radio waves, ELF and ULF in the ionosphere, the highest part of Earth's atmosphere, it is so low and very low frequency (Extremely Low Frequency - Ultra Low Frequency with a minimum to a maximum of 3 Hz to 3000 Hz), both are considered to be electromagnetic waves. Widely
were discharged the impact it could have on health that exposure to these waves, and the results are not encouraging: not only HAARP is capable of generating large-scale seismic events (see Haiti), but the second one study by a University of Arizona electromagnetic waves can affect mood and brain activity. A wave of 6.5 Hz due to depression, a mood of 7 Hz, 5 Hz have serious effects on mental health: the deeper you go, the more serious diagnosis.
We know that animals, especially birds, are very sensitive to these waves, are generally able to perceive earthquakes before us humans, they are more of our sensory faculties. So it is also likely to think that exposure to massive waves of low frequency would "send to tilt their nervous system much faster than it can happen to us.
In conclusion: there really is HAARP behind the memory of birds? We do not have the litmus test, so it can not answer yet, but let's see what they think the media and, therefore, us. In first place among the likely causes of the massacres, there is the poisoning ... you've never heard of a poison that kills a single species of fish or birds? Not me.
Second place: collisions with light cables for birds and fish pollution ... I admit that in some cases these assumptions can not be excluded, but the cables are light for a while, 'I am not aware that in past years there have been massive die-offs of birds for this reason. The same goes for the fish.
In third place (my favorite, brace yourselves): the mortality of birds would be due to the incessant hail of this winter ... Having said that I have not even seen a hailstone this winter (this?), but do you think regular readers of newspapers, also hails underwater?
"All we know so far is that it is something strange. Even in Louisiana, dead birds raining from the sky [...]. An autopsy on some of the birds revealed that the birds died from blood clots due to internal injuries. The problem is what may have caused these injuries experts [...]. Excluding the possibility of poisoning. [...]. And in America there ' who has assumed responsibility for the massacre is the so-called HAARP, the military and civil facilities for scientific research on the upper atmosphere and ionosphere and radio communications for military use. The installation in fact it would a transmitter capable of transmitting electromagnetic waves that might, in theory, have killed the birds, ". (From videocorriere: Moria of birds, the yellow is extended to Louisiana and Sweden .)
At last, the Italian press began to realize that something in this situation again. Of course, you might think, especially in Italy this can not happen, our birds are well ... Too bad you're a bit 'late, because it's already happened and precisely in Faenza, a few days ago. But to return to us, HAARP enough talk in detail.
What we want to understand now is: HAARP involved in the slaughter of birds and fish? We can not say for sure, but I can bring some evidence, let's call them "fragments of truth." As we all know, or maybe not, HAARP, as the article says, is an installation civilian and military, although this title applies only in an official capacity: in fact the "civilian" has very little. In fact, since there, the project has never presented any kind of documentation showing that in fact they were simply conducting surveys or studies only on the ionosphere. A major reason lies in one of the most inaccessible places on the planet, Gakona (Alaska).
has more than 200 antennas, but not only in Alaska, there are many other around the globe, for example, in Europe there is an installation HAARP in Norway. There are many in Asia, even where there were no unusual deaths of birds and fish. There is not even one in Africa, where, guess what, 'there are no scandals. viewing this map on Google Maps, you can watch parts of the world affected by mass extinctions. Try to make a comparison with the map below.
This map shows where the most important stations HAARP. Note that these are the same geographical areas where mysterious deaths have been recorded? And then another question to ask is: why only certain types of birds die, and why only certain species of fish? The installation of Gakona
enter daily exorbitant amount of radio waves, ELF and ULF in the ionosphere, the highest part of Earth's atmosphere, it is so low and very low frequency (Extremely Low Frequency - Ultra Low Frequency with a minimum to a maximum of 3 Hz to 3000 Hz), both are considered to be electromagnetic waves. Widely
were discharged the impact it could have on health that exposure to these waves, and the results are not encouraging: not only HAARP is capable of generating large-scale seismic events (see Haiti), but the second one study by a University of Arizona electromagnetic waves can affect mood and brain activity. A wave of 6.5 Hz due to depression, a mood of 7 Hz, 5 Hz have serious effects on mental health: the deeper you go, the more serious diagnosis.
We know that animals, especially birds, are very sensitive to these waves, are generally able to perceive earthquakes before us humans, they are more of our sensory faculties. So it is also likely to think that exposure to massive waves of low frequency would "send to tilt their nervous system much faster than it can happen to us.
In conclusion: there really is HAARP behind the memory of birds? We do not have the litmus test, so it can not answer yet, but let's see what they think the media and, therefore, us. In first place among the likely causes of the massacres, there is the poisoning ... you've never heard of a poison that kills a single species of fish or birds? Not me.
Second place: collisions with light cables for birds and fish pollution ... I admit that in some cases these assumptions can not be excluded, but the cables are light for a while, 'I am not aware that in past years there have been massive die-offs of birds for this reason. The same goes for the fish.
In third place (my favorite, brace yourselves): the mortality of birds would be due to the incessant hail of this winter ... Having said that I have not even seen a hailstone this winter (this?), but do you think regular readers of newspapers, also hails underwater?
Many resort to show disdain and contempt toward the so-called "conspiracy" by claiming to be good only for imaginative theories without any scientific evidence (information is absolutely false), but I do not think the media is less, for that matter, given that certain stories are invented, about the death of these animals, which are neither in heaven nor on earth.
Absite iniuria verbis.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)