Bluntville Wraps For Sale

Wi (n) kipedia - free content encyclopedia

arid, banal, and sometimes misleading, the encyclopedia Wikipedia and the source most used for research, that the nature of schooling or less, the site receives billions of clicks each day. But perhaps we do get a bit 'too much from the sense of security.

Who guarantees that the information posted on Wikipedia is accurate or reliable? In the paper there is a common encyclopaedia publishing contract in which one writer is responsible for the content, but in the case of Wikipedia? Simply, the answer is no. Since anyone can write or edit entries, the responsibility does not fall on any subject, least of all the editors.

In the case of conspiracy discourse is expanded: the misleading encyclopedia has, for some time, archived pages and pages of conspiracy theories, which, he said, are mere speculation sufalate widely, often, in fact, argues that these assumptions have scientific value (and of course without adding any proof or source that goes to endorse their insinuations)

Here is an example of inconsistency wikipedian:

1. through the ' test reliability "of Wikipedia: Neutral point of view. Sorry, but I do all of this neutral point of view I do not see at all. Do you remember how to define the conspiracy theory about HAARP, hoaxes conspiracy of the followers of David Icke, "the face of neutrality!

2. "In general the errors are solved in the medium term, because sooner or later someone who understands the argument goes and fixes (Wow). In the short term, some believe that Wikipedia is the most authoritative newspaper (which often contain errors Marchiani) but less than an encyclopedia, at least for the items with a little history. You can turn it into positive, reminding people that always has to operate your brain without accepting everything uncritically. "(From Wikipedia)
's ridiculous to think that sooner or later, someone who understands and fixes the argument goes, here we are in Italy! One thing might be possible in England, if anything, but certainly not in our (rotten) country. They said right in the end, press the brain, their service, however, threatens to do the opposite.

recommend, therefore, very careful when you read Wikipedia, do not assume what is written, if the voice is much less controversial issues such as the plot. As rightly called the Rosario Marciano: the home of disinformation.

Romulus, My Wiki ( joke, even one is corrupt)!